RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03278
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be
changed to 8 Aug 96 rather than 20 Nov 96.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His TAFMSD is incorrect and request that 104 days be added to
his total active Federal service.
He submitted a prior BCMR application to have his Active Duty
Service Commitment (ADSC) corrected; however, he did not realize
that his total active Federal service date was erroneous as
well.
He was commissioned in the US Navy, on 10 May 96; however, he
served on active duty as a staff sergeant prior to reporting, on
23 Aug 96, to the Uniformed Services University of the Health
Sciences (USUHS) and did not receive credit for that period of
active duty.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to a Statement of Service, dated 20 Jun 00, on 22 Feb
88, the applicant initially enlisted in the US Navy. On 21 Aug
91, he was honorably discharged from the US Navy.
On 10 May 96, the applicant was commissioned as an Ensign in the
US Navy, as a Medical Service Corps (MSC) officer. On 14 Jul
99, he was discharged to complete an Interservice transfer to
the Air Force Reserve.
On 15 Jul 99, the applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant
in the Air Force Reserve as an MSC officer. On 19 May 00, he
was honorably discharged to accept a Regular Air Force
appointment. On 20 May 00, the applicant was appointed as a
captain in the Regular Air Force. The Statement of Service list
the applicant in student status from 10 May 96 to 19 May 00.
On 19 Jul 12, AFPC/DPAME administratively corrected the
applicant's record by adjusting his ADSC for his time in the Air
Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) by 3 months and
15 days, with a new Active Duty Service Commitment Date (ADSCD)
of 5 Feb 15.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial indicating that based on the
1975 Designator Code on the Oath of Office and the law, Title 10,
Section 2126. Even though his DD Form 214 states that he served
on active duty from 10 May 96 to 14 Jul 99, the law states that
this time in the program is not creditable towards retirement
(active duty) or pay.
DPSIPV received information from the Navy Medical Accessions
Program Manager, indicating the applicant was commissioned in the
Navy Reserves, Designator Code 1975, in an active duty status
on 10 May 96. According to the Manual of Navy Officer Manpower
and Personnel Classifications (NOOCS Manual), Volume 1, Part A,
Section 2, Designator Codes and Descriptions, the definition of
the 1975 designator code is An Unrestricted Line Officer under
instruction in the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship
Program (HPSP) (Medical/Osteopathic). As a member in the
HPSP or USUHS programs, Title 10 USC, Section 2126, states
that service performed while a member of the program shall not
be counted in determining eligibility for retirement or in
computing years of service creditable for pay.
The complete DPSIPV evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant refutes virtually every point made by the OPR and
reiterates his original contention that he was working at the
ROTC unit full-time and not receiving training or education.
The applicant states an attorney with the Office of General
Council, at USUHS agrees with his assessment that the type of
commission was not relevant. If he was working at the ROTC
unit full-time and not receiving training or education, then
his service is creditable for meeting retirement eligibility.
The applicants complete response is at Exhibit E.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission, to include his
rebuttal of the Air Force advisory, in judging the merits of the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale
as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the
victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2014-03278 in Executive Session on 7 May 15 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Aug 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Pertinent Excerpts from Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 9 Feb 15, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Feb 15.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 9 Mar 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01425
DPSIPV states that according to 10 USC, section 2126 the applicant will not be given active duty credit on his DD Form 214 because time spent in USUHS is not counted in determining eligibility towards retirement. In addition, Air Force Instruction 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, defines EAD for the purpose of determining service dates as duty on the ADL of an armed service for 90 days or more. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04047
The applicant contends that she should be eligible for promotion consideration by a Special Selection Board based on precedent that has been established in similar cases decided by this Board in BC-1996- 01097 and the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in AR20090011111 and AR20100025905. Although the applicant was eliminated from medical school on 25 Jun 10, she remained assigned to USUHS on active duty in a student status until such time as she was discharged. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02313
On 17 Oct 09, he was assigned duties in an Air Force office and his OPR for this period proves he fulfilled his service commitment. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit Q). The MRB Legal Advisor states that according to AF/JAA, if an officer is appointed in another competitive category, both the time spent as an enrolled student at the USUHS and time after disenrollment would count toward credit for promotion.
The Air Force has awarded such officers JA briefly addressed the provision in the USUHS contract the applicant signed that excludes USUHS active duty service time "[i]n computing date of rank, promotion service date or total years service date." Before concluding, we briefly address the provision in the USUHS contract the applicant signed that excludes USUHS active duty service time “[iln computing date of rank, promotion service date or total years service date.”I2 In the case of officers...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03929
Title 10, USC, Section 8911, requires a member to serve at least 20 years of active federal military service to be eligible for years of service retirement (see Exhibit F). A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit E. HQ AFPC/DPPRRP notes the applicant had over 15 years of active service at the time of his discharge but was not eligible to submit an application for retirement under the early retirement program because his AFSC was excluded from consideration. A complete copy of the...
Applicant requested an additional year of unfunded training from 1 Jul 98 to 30 Jun 99 for fellowship training in spine surgery; however, this request was denied by DPAME. Constructive credit is awarded once an individual enters active duty; HPSP graduates can be, and frequently are, deferred from active duty upon completion of medical school to obtain residency training (they enter active duty upon completion of their training program); and, USUHS students contractually must go to an...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04064
The applicant is fulfilling active duty service obligation from the date of disenrollment. The applicants contentions regarding his continued service until his separation are noted; however, in accordance with the governing statutes, students participating in the USUHS program serve on active duty, but are not on the active duty list (ADL); are excluded from earning credit for promotion, separation, and retirement and; service performed while a member of the program is not to be counted in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05326
However, the additional time was not credited to the applicants total active federal military service date (TAFMSD) while he was still serving on active duty as a Regular Air Force commissioned officer. Therefore, the time was not accounted for on his 30 Sep 2012, DD Form 214. They recommend reversal of the previously approved addition of two months of active duty service to the applicants 30 Sep 2004 DD Form 214 by ARPC/DPTS.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02795
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02795 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his time as a student at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences (USUHS). At the time of the applicants service and per the statement of service...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00774
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial. The complete DPSIPV evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. APFC/DPSOR recommends the applicants DD Form 214 be corrected to read, Attended Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences...